James v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61 , 14 S. Ct. 26 , 37 L. Ed. 996 ; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840 ; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002 ; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140 , 12 S. Ct. 169 , 35 L. Ed. 966 , and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31 ; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.