TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Munson S. S. Lines v. Newman

Lines v. Newman, 24 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 25, 1928
Docket
No. 5129
Judges
Bryan
Citations
24 F.2d 4161928 A.M.C. 5851928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072

Opinion of the Court — Bryan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty awarding *417 damages for a personal injury sustained by appellee while he was employed as longshoreman and engaged in unloading cargo. A piece of plank used as dunnage was unsound, and broke under appellee’s weight, causing him to lose his balance, with the result that a box of freight which he was lifting fell on him and injured him.

The negligence charged in the libel was the failure to use reasonable care to provide a safe place for the stevedore and his longshoremen to work. It is insisted on this appeal that the failure to use sound boards for dunnage was the fault of the stevedore who loaded the ship, and that the owners are not chargeable with negligence. It is the duty of the ship initially to exercise due diligence to furnish the stevedore with a safe place to work, and she cannot escape liability by showing that a competent stevedore was employed at the loading port when the accident oeeurs in unloading.

Objection was made to the deposition taken at Miami for use in the trial at Jacksonville. The deposition was taken under section 865 of the Revised Statutes (28 USCA § 641), on the ground that the witness was at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place where the court was sitting. There is nothing in the objection, as this court .will take judicial notice that the distance between the cities named is more than 100 miles.

The decree is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1942: 11950: 11953: 11964: 11970: 11974: 12020: 22023: 119422026peak 2020 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs A/s202 F.2d 904 (3d Cir. 1953)
  2. Ramirez v. Toko Kaiun K.K.385 F. Supp. 644 (N.D. Cal. 1974)
  3. Deloro Smelting & Refining Co. v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp.313 F. Supp. 470 (D.N.J. 1970)
  4. Mitchell v. Etna43 F. Supp. 303 (E.D. Pa. 1942)
  5. McNeil v. United States94 F. Supp. 303 (E.D. Pa. 1950)
  6. City of Miami Beach v. Tanner170 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Donegan v. The Toro CompanyNo. 3:22-cv-00332 (W.D. Tex. June 5, 2023)
  2. Sunday v. Belleair Village, LTD.No. 8:20-cv-00078 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 25, 2020)
  3. Sunday v. Belleair Village, LTD.No. 8:20-cv-00078 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2020)
  4. Ramirez v. Toko Kaiun K.K.385 F. Supp. 644 (N.D. Cal. 1974)
  5. Deloro Smelting & Refining Co. v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp.313 F. Supp. 470 (D.N.J. 1970)
  6. City of Miami Beach v. Tanner170 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list