Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM
Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.
Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988 ; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131 ; and Fort Dodge Portland *58 Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113 , the motion must he granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.