Grain King Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
GRAIN KING MFG. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner in this ease is a Minnesota corporation having its principal office at St. Paul, Minn. The petition by consent was filed in this court. The only lawful place in which the petitioner could file a return was at St. Paul. Section 992(b), title 26, U..S. Code, 26 USCA § 992(b). Under section 1225(b), title 26, U. S. Code (26 USCA § '1225(b), the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was the only proper court in which to file a petition to review a decision of the Board. Under our ruling in Massachusetts Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 42 F.(2d) 189 , and Nash- *609 Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner, 42 F. (2d) 192, the cause could not be brought before us by consent.
The petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.