TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Jones

United States v. Jones, 62 F.2d 347 (4th Cir. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 2, 1932
Docket
No. 3339
Judges
Northcott, Parker, Paul
Citations
62 F.2d 3471932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3166

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from, a judgment in favor of plaintiff on a policy of war risk insurance. The policy was continued in force by payment of premiums until August 31, 1919. The only question we need consider is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish total and permanent disability on the part of the insured at that time. We do not think that it was.

There is evidence tending to show that plaintiff was suffering at the time of the lapse of the policy with chronic bronchial asthma, and that he had a fractured coccyx bone; but the fractured coccyx bone did not constitute disability of cither a total or permanent nature, and, while the asthma was chronic, the disability resulting from it was not total. About a month before the policy lapsed, plaintiff went to work as a,n automobile mechanic in a garage at Lumberton, N. C., where he worked for a year ana a half at wages of from $30 to $35 per week. When the firm for which ho was working discontinued business, he went to York, S. C!) and opened up a repair shop of his own; which he operated for about a year. Following this, he worked about a year for the Willys Knight Company at wages of $20 per week. He then worked for about ten months for Scotland county at a wage of $35 per week, repairing trucks for the county highway commission. There can be no question that between 1919 and 1924 he was working with substantial regularity at good wages; and, in view of this, it cannot he said that in 1919 he was totally and permanently disabled. U. S. v. Diehl (C. C. A. 4th) 62 F.(2d) 343 (this day decided); U. S. v. Harrison (C. C. A. 4th) 49 F.(2d) 227 ; Nicolay v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 170 ; U. S. v. McGill (C. C. A.) 56 F.(2d) 522 . The judgment below will ho reversed.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 21934: 11935: 119332026peak 1933 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Personius v. United States65 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1933)
  2. United States v. Rodman68 F.2d 351 (4th Cir. 1934)
  3. Dukes v. United States66 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1933)
  4. United States v. Smith76 F.2d 850 (4th Cir. 1935)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Smith76 F.2d 850 (4th Cir. 1935)
  2. United States v. Rodman68 F.2d 351 (4th Cir. 1934)
  3. Dukes v. United States66 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1933)
  4. Personius v. United States65 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Nicolay v. United States, 51 F.2d 170 (10th Cir. 1931) 101
United States v. Diehl, 62 F.2d 343 (4th Cir. 1932) 53
United States v. Harrison, 49 F.2d 227 (4th Cir. 1931) 34
United States v. McGill, 56 F.2d 522 (8th Cir. 1932) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list