United States v. Lee R. Ball
Opinion
54 F.3d 774 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee R. BALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6946.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 24, 1995. Decided: May 19, 1995.
Lee R. Ball, Appellant Pro Se. Roger William Frydrychowski, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ball, Nos. CR-93-106-R; CA-94-367-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.