TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Solomon

United States v. Solomon, 70 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 21, 1934
Docket
No. 204
Citations
70 F.2d 8341934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

• Motion for leave to proceed on this appeal in forma pauperis.

The defendant pleaded guilty and now appeals from a sentence of two years on count 1 and three years on the other counts of the indictment, the latter to run consecutively with the sentence on count 1. His sole point urged on the appeal is that 18 USCA § 709a, effective June 29, 1932, precludes consecutive sentences. We do not construe this section of the United States Code Annotated as forbidding consecutive sentences.

Application denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 11954: 11957: 11960: 21970: 11992: 119352026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harry Morris Sherman v. United States241 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1957)
  2. Bracey v. Hill11 F. Supp. 148 (M.D. Penn. 1935)
  3. Richard Willard Kay v. United States279 F.2d 734 (6th Cir. 1960)
  4. United States v. Jules W. Wertheimer434 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1970)
  5. Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation974 F.2d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
  6. Gus La Vern Hiller v. United States218 F.2d 641 (9th Cir. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation974 F.2d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
  2. United States v. Jules W. Wertheimer434 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1970)
  3. Knight v. United States185 F. Supp. 397 (W.D. Ky. 1960)
  4. Richard Willard Kay v. United States279 F.2d 734 (6th Cir. 1960)
  5. Harry Morris Sherman v. United States241 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1957)
  6. Gus La Vern Hiller v. United States218 F.2d 641 (9th Cir. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list