TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Taylor-Wharton Iron & Steel Co. v. Commissioner

TAYLOR-WHARTON IRON & STEEL CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Taylor-Wharton Iron & Steel Co. v. Comm'r, 74 F.2d 300 (3d Cir. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 4, 1934
Docket
No. 5441
Judges
Davis, Thompson, Woolley
Citations
74 F.2d 30014 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8461934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 956914 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8461934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3945

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The consolidated income tax return filed ■by the parent of a group of affiliated corporations disclosed that certain of the affiliates had separately sustained losses which resulted in losses sustained by the group in 1924 *301 and 1925. In 1926, the taxable year, the same affiliates again sustained losses; yet, after deducting them from profits made by other affiliates, the group made a gain. In determining the taxable gain, the petitioning taxpayer made an effort to carry forward as a unit and apply the consolidated net losses in .1.924 and 1925 against the consolidated net gain in 1926 without reference to that year’s gains or losses of the individual corporate affiliates. The Commissioner disallowed deductions of prior losses from the later gain. From an order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals affirming his decision, the matter is here on the taxpayer’s petition.

Wo affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals generally on the line of its own reasoning and particularly on authority of Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319 , 52 S. Ct. 568 , 76 L. Ed. 1128 , which was discussed and relied upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Commissioner, 65 F.(2d) 292 , and by this court in Beneficial Loan Society v. Commissioner, 65 F.(2d) 759 . The action of the Supreme Court in denying certiorari in these two cases, 290 U. S. 670 , 54 S. Ct. 89 , 78 L. Ed. 579 and 290 U. S. 677 , 54 S. Ct. 101 , 78 L. Ed. 584 , while not officially significant, inclines us to the belief that the two courts properly understood the law of the Woolf ord Realty Co. Case and that this court is correctly applying it now.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. S. Slater & Sons, Inc. v. White119 F.2d 839 (1st Cir. 1941)

Most recent

  1. S. Slater & Sons, Inc. v. White119 F.2d 839 (1st Cir. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U.S. 319 (1932) 190
United States v. Highland Milk Condensing Co., 290 U.S. 671 (1933) 12
William C. Atwater & Co. v. United States, 290 U.S. 678 (1933) 10
Del. & Hudson Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 65 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1933) 7
Beneficial Loan Soc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 65 F.2d 759 (3d Cir. 1933) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list