TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walters v. Baltimore & O. R.

WALTERS et ux. v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

Walters v. Baltimore & O. R., 76 F.2d 599 (3d Cir. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 7, 1935
Docket
No. 5624
Judges
Thompson
Citations
76 F.2d 5991935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2626

Opinion of the Court — Thompson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the ' District Court for the. Western District of Pennsylvania. The appellants brought suit in trespass against the appellee for injuries sustained by the wife appellant because of the alleged negligence of a railroad policeman employed by the appellee. ■ The court below entered a'compulsory-nonsuit. An order denying the appellants’ motion to *600 strike off the compulsory nonsuit whs entered on March 17,1934.

28 USCA § 230 provides: “No writ of error or appeal intended to bring any judgment or decree before a circuit court of appeals for review shall be allowed unless application therefor be duly made within three months after the entry of such judgment or decree.”

It was necessary, therefore, for the appeal to be taken not later than June 17, 1934. That day fell on a Sunday. It appears from the record that this appeal was not taken until Monday, June 18, 1934.

In George v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 293 U. S. 377 , 55 S. Ct. 229 , 79 L. Ed. —, the Supreme Court held that this court was without jurisdiction to entertain an appeal which was not taken within the time prescribed by law. It is therefore apparent that, if the appeal in the instant case was not taken within three months after the entry of the refusal to strike off the compulsory nonsuit, we are without jurisdiction to consider the case upon the merits. The fact that the last day fell on a Sunday does not entitle the appellants to enter their appéal one day after the three-month period has expired. It was so held in Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Pfeifer, 36 F.(2d) 5 (C. C. A. 8); Maresca v. United States, 277 F. 727 (C. C. A. 2), certiorari denied 257 U. S. 657 , 42 S. Ct. 183 , 66 L. Ed. 420 ; Meyer v. Hot Springs Imp. Co., 169 F. 628 (C. C. A. 9); Blaffer v. New Orleans Water Supply Co., 160 F. 389 (C. C. A. 5); and Johnson v. Meyers, 54 F. 417 (C. C. A. 8). The court being without jurisdiction, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 11941: 11942: 11945: 11949: 11952: 11953: 219402026peak 1953 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Benitez v. Bank of Nova Scotia109 F.2d 743 (1st Cir. 1940)
  2. Union National Bank v. Lamb337 U.S. 38 (1949)
  3. Wilson v. Southern Ry. Co.147 F.2d 165 (5th Cir. 1945)
  4. Waddell v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission206 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1953)
  5. General Lead Batteries Co. v. Commissioner20 T.C. 685 (Tax Ct. 1953)
  6. United States v. Reed117 F.2d 808 (5th Cir. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Waddell v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission206 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1953)
  2. General Lead Batteries Co. v. Commissioner20 T.C. 685 (Tax Ct. 1953)
  3. Depew Paving Co. v. United States104 F. Supp. 94 (Ct. Cl. 1952) · Dissent
  4. Union National Bank v. Lamb337 U.S. 38 (1949)
  5. Wilson v. Southern Ry. Co.147 F.2d 165 (5th Cir. 1945)
  6. Mahan v. Sparks10 Alaska 292 (D. Alaska 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
George v. Victor Talking MacHine Co., 293 U.S. 377 (1934) 27
Maresca v. United States, 277 F. 727 (2d Cir. 1921) 34
Johnson v. Meyers, 54 F. 417 (8th Cir. 1893) 29
Meyer v. Hot Springs Imp. Co., 169 F. 628 (9th Cir. 1909) 23
Northwestern Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pfeifer, 36 F.2d 5 (8th Cir. 1929) 18
Blaffer v. New Orleans Water Supply Co., 160 F. 389 (5th Cir. 1908) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list