TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Quigley v. Whyte

Quigley v. Whyte, 85 F.2d 301 (D.C. Cir. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 8, 1936
Docket
No. 6634
Judges
Orsdel
Citations
85 F.2d 30166 App. D.C. 1351936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4098

Opinion of the Court — Orsdel

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case is analogous to and controlled by the opinion in No. 6633, 66 App.D.C. 134 , 85 F.(2d) 300 , this day announced.

The only distinction between these cases is that Mary E. Quigley, the mother, opened an account in her own name in the Perpetual Building Association prior to August 21, 1924, and on July 9, 1926, she opened another account in her own name. Prior to her death, on about August 21, 1924, and October 9, 1928, signature cards in respect of the accounts were signed by her with the name Frances Q. Whyte appearing above her signature on one of the cards and below her signature on the other card, so that the signature in respect of both accounts read: “The accounts to be theirs as joint owners, subject to the order of either, and balance at death of either to the survivor.” The same allegation appears in the declaration to the effect that there was no intention on the part of Mary E. Quigley, the mother,' of converting these accounts into one of joint ownership with her daughter Frances Q. Whyte, or of giving the defendant any present or future ownership therein. It is alleged that just prior to the death of Mary E. Quigley the defendant wrongfully withdrew from the Perpetual Building Association the entire balance then remaining in the accounts.

There being nothing to distinguish this case from No. 6633, the judgment is affirmed with costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 11952: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Murray v. Gadsden197 F.2d 194 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  2. Harrington v. Emmerman186 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Murray v. Gadsden197 F.2d 194 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  2. Harrington v. Emmerman186 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Quigley v. Quigley, 85 F.2d 300 (D.C. Cir. 1936) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list