Ticonic Nat. Bank v. Sprague
TICONIC NAT. BANK OF WATERVILLE, ME. v. SPRAGUE
Subsequent history: rev'd, Sprague v. Ticonic Nat'l Bank, 307 U.S. 161 (1939). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
We are of the opinion that the decree of the District Court is correct except in so far as it allows'interest; that in allowing interest from July 30, 1935 (the date of the bringing of the bill of complaint), the court erred.
The decree of the District Court is modified by striking therefrom the words “with interest from July 30, 1935,” and so modified is affirmed, with costs to the appellees in this court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.