Belle-Midwest, Inc. v. Missouri Property & Casualty Insurance Guarantee Association
BELLE-MIDWEST, INC., Appellant, v. MISSOURI PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Appellee
Opinion
STROM, District Judge.
Belle-Midwest, Inc. appeals an order entered in the United States District Court 1
for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, dismissing its claim without prejudice on the condition that plaintiff pay the defendant $12,027.69 in attorney’s fees and costs before the case could be refiled.
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). We dismiss the appeal.
Generally, a moving plaintiff may not appeal from an order granting a voluntary dismissal.
Bowers v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 668 F.2d 369 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 946 , 102 S.Ct. 2013 , 72 L.Ed.2d 469 (1982). This circuit recognizes an exception, however, where the plaintiff is legally prejudiced by the conditions imposed by the district court in granting the voluntary dismissal and plaintiff has evidenced no acquiescence to those conditions.
Id.
at 370. In the present case, Belle-Midwest met the second prerequisite when it filed a motion to set aside and hold for naught the district court’s order granting the voluntary dismissal. Nevertheless, Belle-Midwest cannot demonstrate that it has been “legally prejudiced” by the district court’s conditions. As we stated in Bowers , “although restricting to a certain degree his right to refile this action, [the condition] does not ‘severely circumscribe’ his ability to actually reinitiate the suit.”
Id.
In granting a motion for voluntary dismissal, district courts typically im *979 pose the condition that plaintiff pay the defendant the reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in defending the suit.
Marlow v. Winston & Strawn, 19 F.3d 300, 303 (7th Cir.1994). In fact, this Court has held that under certain circumstances, it is an abuse of discretion for a district court not to condition a voluntary dismissal upon plaintiffs payment of costs and attorney’s fees if the case is reñled.
Kern v. TXO Production Corp., 738 F.2d 968, 972 (8th Cir.1984). Such was the case here and we find that $12,027.69 was a reasonable figure. Under these circumstances, the order of dismissal is not appeal-able by Belle-Midwest. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
1
. The Honorable Stephen M. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[i]n granting a motion for voluntary dismissal, district courts typically impose the condition that plaintiff pay the defendant the reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in defending the suit”)
-
(generally, plaintiffs may not appeal order granting voluntary dismissal, except where plaintiffs were legally prejudiced by conditions imposed by district court in granting voluntary dismissal, and they did not acquiesce to conditions)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Stephen E. Duffy Sue Ann Duffy v. Ford Motor Company
- United States v. Thirty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars & Fifty-Six Cents ($32,820.56) in United States Currency
- Emmitt v. Dickey
- Thoubboron v. Ford Motor Co.
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
- Mercer Tool Corp. v. Friedr. Dick GmbH
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.