TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ward v. Flynn ex rel. Lee Sui

WARD, Commissioner of Immigration v. FLYNN ex rel. LEE SUI

Ward v. Flynn ex rel. Lee Sui, 92 F.2d 416 (1st Cir. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 19, 1937
Docket
No. 3245
Citations
92 F.2d 4161937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which the relator claims to be the daughter of an American citizen of Chinese descent. The Immigration Board, after a full hearing, found that the relator had not estab lished her relationship and recommended that she be deported. The Secretary of Labor so ordered. It was to test the validity of this order that the writ of habeas corpus was brought. In the District Court the writ was sustained and the relator discharged from custody on the ground that the immigration authorities, in reaching the conclusion that they did on the evidence, acted unfairly.

We think the court erred in so finding and ruling. The evidence introduced before the immigration authorities was highly conflicting. The witnesses examined before the Board testified in flat contradiction of what they had stated at prior examinations and when they apparently had no interest to misrepresent. “The. denial of a fair hearing is not established by proving merely that the decision was wrong” — that there was error in weighing the evidence. Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 , 44 S.Ct. 260, 261 , 68 L.Ed. 590 ; Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U.S. 8, 12, 13 , 28 S.Ct. 201 , 52 L.Ed. 369 ; Johnson v. Kock Shing (C.C.A.) 3 F.(2d) 889 .

The order of the District Court discharging the relator from custody is vacated, the petition is dismissed, and she is remanded to the custody-of the Commissioner.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1943: 119432026peak 1943 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bogartz v. Astor182 Misc. 214 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Most recent

  1. Bogartz v. Astor182 Misc. 214 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Yow v. United States, 208 U.S. 8 (1908) 271
United States ex rel. Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 (1924) 122
Johnson v. Kock Shing, 3 F.2d 889 (1st Cir. 1924) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list