TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thompson v. Johnston

THOMPSON v. JOHNSTON, Warden

Thompson v. Johnston, 94 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 11, 1938
Docket
No. 8714
Judges
Stephens
Citations
94 F.2d 3551938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417

Opinion of the Court — Stephens

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court (Northern District of California) denied the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus upon appellant’s petition, hence this appeal by him.

Petitioner is restrained of his liberties by virtue of conviction and sentence upon three indictment charges. His only point is that he was convicted and sentenced to prison, where he is now restrained of his liberties, upon a conspiracy charge, which is not of itself a crime since the scheme to violate a federal law was actually accomplished and petitioner was convicted and sentenced to prison upon the substantive offense.

We need but quote one sentence from Parmagini v. United States, 1930, 9 Cir., 42 F.2d 721 , 725 : “The last count of conspiracy to violate these laws is a separate and distinct offense punishable as such. Ader v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 284 F. 13 ; Brady v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 24 F.2d 405 , 59 A.L.R. 563 .” 18 U.S.C.A. § 88 .

The ruling of the District Court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 11951: 11953: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Rouse v. State97 A.2d 285 (Md. 1953)
  2. Harrison v. King111 F.2d 420 (8th Cir. 1940)
  3. Ex parte Jones100 F. Supp. 598 (W.D. Wash. 1951)

Most recent

  1. Rouse v. State97 A.2d 285 (Md. 1953)
  2. Ex parte Jones100 F. Supp. 598 (W.D. Wash. 1951)
  3. Harrison v. King111 F.2d 420 (8th Cir. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Brady v. United States, 24 F.2d 405 (8th Cir. 1928) 27
Parmagini v. United States, 42 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1930) 39
Ader v. United States, 284 F. 13 (7th Cir. 1922) 33

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list