Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Nollman
FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. NOLLMAN FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. SAME
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
These two cases present the same questions of fact and law. Appellee, Mrs. R. M. Nollman, was injured by slipping on ice that had formed on the sidewalk in front of appellant’s premises, alleged to have resulted from its negligence.
The only question presented for decision is whether the District Court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence; and, in the alternative, for judgment non-obstante veredicto, or a new trial.
We find substantial evidence in the record tending to support the verdict.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.