TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Asher

United States v. Asher, 111 F.2d 59 (9th Cir. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 4, 1940
Docket
No. 9301
Judges
Mathews
Citations
111 F.2d 5924 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8731940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570

Opinion of the Court — Mathews

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In an action by appellee, Max Asher, against appellant, the United States, appellant obtained judgment against appellee. The judgment was that appellee take nothing by his action, and that appellant have and recover of and from appellee its costs,, which, by the judgment, were taxed in the sum of $10. This appeal is from “that portion of said judgment fixing and taxing costs.”

The judgment was entered on February 27, 1939. This appeal was taken on May 26, 1939. Appellant specifies as error the District Court’s refusal “to set aside the refusal of the clerk to tax as costs an item of $í.50” claimed by appellant. That refusal (by the court) occurred on November 7, 1939, long after this appeal was taken. It, therefore, cannot be reviewed on this appeal. No other error is specified.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11956: 11959: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Gallagher151 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1945)
  2. Carl C. Lee v. United States238 F.2d 341 (9th Cir. 1956)
  3. Mohr v. United States168 F. Supp. 734 (E.D. Va. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Mohr v. United States168 F. Supp. 734 (E.D. Va. 1959)
  2. Carl C. Lee v. United States238 F.2d 341 (9th Cir. 1956)
  3. United States v. Gallagher151 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list