TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cline v. United States

Cline v. United States, 116 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 20, 1940
Docket
No. 9561
Judges
Dawkins, Holmes, Sibley
Citations
116 F.2d 2751940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2616

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty February 5, 1940, and was sentenced to three years imprisonment on the first count; and'fifteen years on the remaining counts, with execution suspended for probation to begin at expiration of service of the sentence on the first count. On the same day, in jail awaiting transportation to the penitentiary, Cline’s person was searched and a large quantity of contraband narcotics was found. He was brought back into court, and the judge revoked the suspension of execution of sentence on the counts other than the first, and changed the term from fifteen years to ten years, to be served on expiration of service of the sentence on the first count. Notice of appeal was filed, the. grounds all relating to the legality of the search, and the power of the judge, before the time of probation had arrived, to revoke it and resentence on the counts as to which execution of sentence was suspended. Bail was granted pending appeal, and on April 22 the court granted an extension of time for sixty days to perfect the appeal. The appeal was docketed in this court June 10. On call of the case for argument on Nov. 15, after due notice of its setting, no transcript of the record or brief had been filed and the United States moved to dismiss the appeal. Counsel for appellant asked for time to file a brief which has expired and no brief has been filed. The case is subject to dismissal under our rules for want of prosecution, but we have looked into its merits far enough to satisfy ourselves that the search of a convict about to be transported to the penitentiary is not unlawful; and that the judge had power to take the action he did. No sufficient reason appears why our rules should not be enforced. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 11964: 11967: 11968: 11971: 11974: 21982: 11983: 11984: 119562026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. James David Ross503 F.2d 940 (5th Cir. 1974)
  2. Wright v. United States315 A.2d 839 (D.C. 1974)
  3. United States v. Joseph James Wright, Jr.744 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1984)
  4. C. H. Bartlett and Henry Grady Armstrong v. United States232 F.2d 135 (5th Cir. 1956)
  5. United States v. Robert Harris Cartwright696 F.2d 344 (5th Cir. 1983)
  6. United States v. Joseph Henry Donat Norin378 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1967)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Joseph James Wright, Jr.744 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1984)
  2. United States v. Robert Harris Cartwright696 F.2d 344 (5th Cir. 1983)
  3. United States v. Dozier543 F. Supp. 880 (M.D. La. 1982)
  4. United States v. James David Ross503 F.2d 940 (5th Cir. 1974)
  5. Wright v. United States315 A.2d 839 (D.C. 1974)
  6. United States ex rel. Sole v. Rundle435 F.2d 721 (3d Cir. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list