TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Graham v. Federal Tender Board No. 1

Graham v. Fed. Tender Bd. No. 1, 118 F.2d 8 (5th Cir. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 4, 1941
Docket
No. 9339
Judges
Foster
Citations
118 F.2d 81941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922

Opinion of the Court — Foster

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Federal Tender Board No. 1, organized under the provisions of the Act of February 22, 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 715 et seq., known as the Connally Act, to administer the law in the East Texas oil field issued and served a subpoena upon appellant requiring him to appear before it to give testimony pertinent to an investigation it was conducting. Upon his refusal to comply with .the order this suit was brought in the United States District Court to compel him to do so. An order to show cause issued. Appellant answered the rule, denying the jurisdiction and authority of the Board. From an adverse ruling this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellant does not challenge the validity of the law nor the authority of the Board generally but contends the Board can proceed only by mandatory injunction, under the provisions of Section 10 of the Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 715i.

Section 9 of the Act, IS U.S.C.A. § 715h provides the Board may hold and conduct hearings and investigations as may be necessary and incorporates by reference the provisions of Section 21 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act, IS U.S.C. A. § 78u, which authorizes the commission to subpoena witnesses and apply to the District Court to compel their attendance. The provision of the Connally Act for a mandatory injunction does not set aside or nullify this part of the statute. The provisions are complementary and the Board, in its discretion, may use either method in seeking information to enable it to administer the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 11944: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board146 F.2d 596 (5th Cir. 1944)
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. v. Fleming119 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board146 F.2d 596 (5th Cir. 1944)
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. v. Fleming119 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list