TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd., a Limited Partnership, by and Through Its General Partner Motorcity of Jacksonville, Inc., a Florida Corporation, David Hess v. Southeast Bank, N.A., David Feigenbaum, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Southeast Bank, N.A.

Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 58 F.3d 589 (11th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 29, 1995
Docket
No. 93-4634
Citations
58 F.3d 5891995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16099

Opinion

58 F.3d 589

MOTORCITY OF JACKSONVILLE, LTD., a limited partnership, By and Through its general partner MOTORCITY OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., a Florida corporation, David Hess, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., David Feigenbaum, Defendants, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Southeast Bank, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-4634.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 29, 1995.

Lawrence R. Heller and Dyanne E. Feinberg, Miami, FL, Kipp A. Coddington, Christopher D. Cerf, Daniel E. Troy and Stephen Goldman, Washington, DC, for Motorcity and David Hess.

Julie Feigeles, Miami, FL, S. Alyssa Roberts, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 91-2305-CIV-Highsmith), Shelby Highsmith, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion December 4, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 39 F.3d 292 )

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, 2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list