Yates v. McGowan
YATES v. McGOWAN, Collector of Internal Revenue
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Point I of appellant’s brief was not misapprehended or left undecided. The transactions from which he derived taxable gain were the 1930 and 1931 redemptions of bonds acquired in 1927. Hence Fairbanks v. United States, 306 U.S. 436, 438 , 59 S.Ct. 607 , 83 L.Ed. 855 , is controlling. That the bonds were acquired in 1927 in exchange for capital assets in a non-taxable transaction does not affect the character of the later transactions from which the taxable gain was derived. See Felin v. Kyle, 3 Cir., 102 F.2d 349 .
Petition for rehearing denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.