TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish

Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish, 130 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 6, 1942
Docket
No. 311
Citations
130 F.2d 2551942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The findings of the referee must stand unless “clearly erroneous.” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e) (2), 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c. In this case not only is that not true, but they are plainly correct; the bankrupt was shown beyond peradventure to be totally undeserving of a discharge. It is hard to see on what theory he could have expected the appeal to succeed.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 11948: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diamond Laundry Corp. v. California Employment Stabilization Commission162 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1947)
  2. Abrams v. Astor170 F.2d 544 (2d Cir. 1948)

Most recent

  1. Abrams v. Astor170 F.2d 544 (2d Cir. 1948)
  2. Diamond Laundry Corp. v. California Employment Stabilization Commission162 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1947)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list