Corning Glass Works v. Coe
CORNING GLASS WORKS v. Conway P. COE, Commissioner of Patents
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The findings and judgment of the trial court, 51 F.Supp. 232 , find full support in the record. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding 1 and is not entitled to a patent.
Affirmed.
35 U.S.C.A. § 63 ; Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 197, 198 , 109 F.2d 449, 451, 452 ; Daniels v. Coe, 73 App.D.C. 54, 58 , 116 F.2d 941, 945 ; Morrison v. Coe, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 220 , 127 F.2d 737, 738 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.