TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Federation of Railway Workers v. National Mediation Board

Nat'l Fed'n of Ry. Workers v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 141 F.2d 725 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 27, 1944
Docket
No. 8591
Judges
Groner, Miller
Citations
141 F.2d 72579 U.S. App. D.C. 1614 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 5601944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3781

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants in this case are a railway labor union, known as the National Federation of Railway Workers, and appellees are the National Mediation Board and its individual members.

The controversy involves a representative dispúte between two unions. The Federation at the time in question represented the railway shop laborers, including the Reclamation Plant laborers of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company at Marshall, Texas. In April, 1941, the Brotherhood of Firemen, Oilers, etc., invoked the services of the Board for an investigation and certification that it was the bargaining representative of the employees of the Railway performing work generally recognized as that of power house employees and shop laborers.

The Board took jurisdiction, called an election and certified a list of persons eligible to vote. At the election the Reclamation Plant laborers were denied the privilege of voting. As a result of the Federation’s protest the dispute was considered by the Board and it was held that the election was in all respects proper, the protest of the Federation was dismissed and the Brotherhood certified as the bargaining representative of the employees concerned..

The District Court dismissed appellants’' complaint and this appeal followed. The motion to dismiss is made on the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court in Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , in which it was held that neither this court nor the District Court had jurisdiction to review certifications issued by the Board. For reasons stated by us in, Order of Railway Conductors v. National Mediation Board,, 79 U.S.App.D.C. -, 141 F.2d 366 , and United Transport Service Employees v. National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App. D.C. -, 141 F.2d 724 , decided today, we think the motion must be granted and the: appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11949: 11950: 11954: 11955: 11958: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Switchmen's Union v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 320 U.S. 297 (1943) 459
Order of Ry. Conductors of Am. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 141 F.2d 366 (D.C. Cir. 1944) 15
United Transp. Serv. Employees of Am. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 141 F.2d 724 (D.C. Cir. 1944) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list