TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Texas v. Tabasco Consol. Independent School Dist.

STATE OF TEXAS v. TABASCO CONSOL. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.

Texas v. Tabasco Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 142 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 2, 1944
Docket
No. 10802
Judges
Hutcheson, Lee, Sibley
Citations
142 F.2d 581944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3252

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding to compose the indebtedness of appellee produced a plan agreed to by 92% of the indebtedness, but objected to by 8% owned by the Permanent School Fund of the State of Texas. It was confirmed by the District Court. On appeal this court found nothing wrong with the plan except that the Permanent School Fund was to get settlement in cash while others in the same class were to get 4% bonds, which was held to be a discrimination. The opinion concludes: “In order that the plan may be modified in this respect, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.” Texas v. Tabasco School District, 5 Cir., 132 F.2d 62, 64 , rehearing denied 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 196 . In the District Court the plan was duly amended so as to give all creditors an option to receive cash or bonds. The objecting creditors sought to reopen the question of the ability of the School District to pay more. The District Court thought this court had not authorized a reconsideration of that matter and declined *59 to hear further evidence on it. We think the former opinion of the court dealt finally with that question, and reopened the plan for amendment for the sole purpose of removing discrimination in the mode of payment. The amendment did that.

The judgment reconfirming the plan is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 12000: 12001: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Total System Services, Inc.240 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 2001)
  2. Mason v. Paradise Irr. Dist.149 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1945)
  3. EEOC v. Total System Services, Inc.221 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2000)

Most recent

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Total System Services, Inc.240 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 2001)
  2. EEOC v. Total System Services, Inc.221 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2000)
  3. Mason v. Paradise Irr. Dist.149 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Texas v. Tabasco Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 132 F.2d 62 (5th Cir. 1942) 3
Texas v. Tabasco Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 133 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1943) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list