Waters v. United States
Woodfin Vance WATERS v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted with others of the crime of illicit distilling; and the sole question presented by the appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of guilt on his part to take the case to the jury. For reasons adequately set forth in the opinion of the District Judge denying appellant’s motion for a new trial, we think that the evidence was sufficient.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.