TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Banghart v. United States

Banghart v. United States, 148 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1945)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 2, 1945
Docket
No. 5351
Judges
Curtam, Dobie, Parker, Soper
Citations
148 F.2d 5211945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2462

Opinion of the Court — Curtam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURTAM.

This is an appeal by Basil Banghart and Ludwig Schmidt from the denial of a motion to strike out sentences imposed upon them under counts 3, 4 and 12 of a twelve count indictment, they having been convicted on all counts of the indictment. Count 2 charged a robbery of the mail with a putting in jeopardy of the life of the custodian; and under that count both Banghart and Schmidt were sentenced to terms of 25 years. Counts 3 and 4 charged injury to mail bags with intent to steal the mail and count 12 charged conspiracy to rob the mail. Banghart was given a two year sentence under each of these counts, and Schmidt a two year sentence under count twelve, the sentences to-run consecutively. Their contention is that the crimes charged under counts 3, 4 and 12 were parts of the same crime for which they were given the 25 year sentence under count 2, and that, consequently, additional sentences under those counts are void as constituting double jeopardy.

We think that there is no merit whatever in the contentions of appellants. It is well settled that conspiracy to commit a crime is a separate and distinct offense from the crime which is the object of the conspiracy and may be separately punished. United States v. Rabinowich, 238 U.S. 78 , 35 S.Ct. 682 , 59 L.Ed. 1211 ; Heike v. United States, 227 U.S. 131 , 33 S.Ct. 226 , 57 L.Ed. 450 ; Old Monastery Co. v. United States, 4 Cir., 147 F.2d 905 ; Short v. United States, 4 Cir. 91 F.2d 614, 621 , 112 A.L.R. 969 ; Lisansky v. United States, 4 Cir., 31 F.2d 846 , 67 A.L.R. 67 . Likewise, the crime of cutting or injuring a mail bag with intent to steal the mail denounced by sec. 189 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 312 , is a different offense and. involves different elements from the crime of robbery denounced by sec. 197, IS *522 U.S.C.A. § 320. To make out the offense, injury to the bag must be shown; and this is not an element of the crime denounced by the robbery statute. Cf. Hunt v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir. 111 F.2d 42 ; Johnston v. Lagomarsino, 9 Cir. 88 F.2d 86 . The injury to each bag constitutes a separate offense under sec. 189. Ebeling v. Morgan, 237 U.S. 625 , 35 S.Ct. 710 , 59 L.Ed. 1151 .

The decision of the District Court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1945: 11946: 11947: 11952: 11953: 11954: 11957: 11960: 11980: 21990: 119452026peak 1980 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Guillermo Guevarra Valdez, Alias Memo Valdez v. United States249 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1957)
  2. Pinkerton v. United States328 U.S. 640 (1946)
  3. Frankfeld v. United States198 F.2d 679 (4th Cir. 1952)
  4. State v. Handsome266 S.E.2d 670 (N.C. 1980)
  5. United States v. Hunter123 F. Supp. 1 (D. Maryland 1954)
  6. United States v. Sharpe61 F. Supp. 237 (E.D. Ky. 1945)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Nagle30 M.J. 1229 (1990)
  2. United States v. Sutton642 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1980)
  3. State v. Handsome266 S.E.2d 670 (N.C. 1980)
  4. Le Prell v. State124 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
  5. Guillermo Guevarra Valdez, Alias Memo Valdez v. United States249 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1957)
  6. United States v. Hunter123 F. Supp. 1 (D. Maryland 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 8

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Rabinowich, 238 U.S. 78 (1915) 340
Heike v. United States, 227 U.S. 131 (1913) 261
Ebeling v. Morgan, 237 U.S. 625 (1915) 223
Short v. United States, 91 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1937) 67
Lisansky v. United States, 31 F.2d 846 (4th Cir. 1929) 59
Old Monastery Co. v. United States, 147 F.2d 905 (4th Cir. 1945) 37
Johnston v. Lagomarsino, 88 F.2d 86 (9th Cir. 1937) 23
Hunt v. Hudspeth, 111 F.2d 42 (10th Cir. 1940) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list