Commissioner v. Snowden
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SNOWDEN
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This case, as the Porter and Lightner cases (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Porter) 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 566 , do, involves the question whether income received by the beneficiary of trusts created and managed in New York was separate or community property. The only difference be *570 tween this case and those is that in this case the taxpayer was a man. The same contentions are made, the same arguments advanced as in the Porter and Lightner cases. For the reasons given for affirming the decision of the Tax Court in those cases, its decision in this case is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.