TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Ellis

STATE OF OREGON v. WILLIAM ELLIS

State v. Ellis, 3 Or. 497 (1869)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Oregon Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1869
Judges
Wilson
Citations
3 Or. 497
Summary
Appeal from Clatsop County. From the judgment and sentence passed upon appellant, in the court below, on a verdict of guilty of an attempt to commit rape, he appealed to this court, and the notice of appeal contains no specification or assignment of error. Appellant moves the court to dismiss the appeal for that reason.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wilson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Wilson, J.

The requisitions of the Code in reference to appeals in criminal, materially differ from those in regard to *498 civil causes. On the part of tlie state, tbe grounds for appeal are limited to two causes. , Notices are to be served differently. No bond in appeal other tban a bail bond is required. The effect of tbe appeal is changed in some respects. And the reasons for dismissal are limited, and nowhere does it require that the notice of appeal' shall contain an assignment of errors. The Legislature evidently intended to provide all necessary regulations in appeals in criminal matters in the enactment of the Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Code; and when a party has complied with all necessary -provisions found there, we think he has a right to be heard here. In order that certainty may be obtained in tbis class of cases, under tbe authority of the statutes, this court will order as a rule, that, after the appealed case is in this court, the appellant shall, if required by respondent, make and file here an assignment of the errors relied upon, within such time as the court may indicate. The motion is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1908: 11933: 11939: 11961: 21972: 11983: 119082026peak 1961 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Archerd24 P.2d 5 (Or. 1933)
  2. State v. Rosser91 P.2d 295 (Or. 1939)
  3. State v. Montgomery657 P.2d 668 (Or. 1983)
  4. State v. Berger94 P. 181 (Or. 1908)
  5. State v. Foster366 P.2d 896 (Or. 1961)
  6. State v. Garrett363 P.2d 762 (Or. 1961)

Most recent

  1. State v. Montgomery657 P.2d 668 (Or. 1983)
  2. State v. A 1963 Corvette Automobile501 P.2d 330 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)
  3. State v. Foster366 P.2d 896 (Or. 1961)
  4. State v. Garrett363 P.2d 762 (Or. 1961)
  5. State v. Rosser91 P.2d 295 (Or. 1939)
  6. State v. Archerd24 P.2d 5 (Or. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list