TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blatchley v. Securities & Exchange Commission

BLATCHLEY v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Blatchley v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 157 F.2d 901 (1st Cir. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 29, 1946
Docket
No. 4202
Citations
157 F.2d 9015 SEC Jud. Dec. 211946 WL 628781946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3790

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Harry C. Blatchley here appeals from an order of the United' States District Court *902 for the District of Maine, made orally on July 10, 1946, denying a motion to remit a petition in the nature of a bill of review, theretofore filed in the said court by Blatchley, to the Securities and Exchange Commission for hearing thereon. The bill of review sought to reopen a proceeding before the court instituted by the Commission under § 11(e)' of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 803 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k(e), for the enforcement of a certain plan of reorganization of New England Public Service Company. For the background, see our opinion in Harry C. Blatchley, Petitioner, 157 F.2d 894 . Appellee New England Public Service Company moves to docket and dismiss the appeal. The motion must be granted for the reason that the order appealed from is interlocutory in character, and does not fall within any of the categories of interlocutory orders made appealable by 28 U.S.C.A. § 227 .

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1946: 11952: 119462026peak 1946 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Blatchley157 F.2d 894 (1st Cir. 1946)
  2. Kuchman v. Commissioner18 T.C. 154 (Tax Ct. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Kuchman v. Commissioner18 T.C. 154 (Tax Ct. 1952)
  2. In re Blatchley157 F.2d 894 (1st Cir. 1946)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Blatchley, 157 F.2d 894 (1st Cir. 1946) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list