TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Makowski v. Benson

MAKOWSKI v. BENSON, Warden

Makowski v. Benson, 158 F.2d 158 (6th Cir. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 18, 1946
Docket
No. 10231
Citations
158 F.2d 1581946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2350

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record and briefs for the petitioner-appellant and for appellee, Ralph E. Benson, Warden;

And it appearing that the petitioner filed a petition in the Circuit Court for the County of Jackson, State of Michigan, for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied, and that the petitioner thereafter filed another petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court for the County of Jackson, State of Michigan, which was denied on June 15, 1944, and it not appearing that an appeal was taken from either of said orders; and it further appearing that the petitioner also filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the State of Michigan for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied on October 6, 1944, and it not appearing that an application was made by the appellant in the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari; and since the petitioner therefore has not exhausted the state remedies available to him (Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114 , 64 S.Ct. 448 , 88 L.Ed. 572 ; Dawsett v. Benson, 6 Cir., 156 F.2d 669 );

And since such facts appear undisputed from the record herein and are not affected in any way by any statements of fact or argument relative to the merits of the case contained in the brief recently filed on behalf of the appellee, which petitioner-appellant claims are erroneous, and since the resulting lack of jurisdiction to consider the case on its merits renders such factual issue immaterial to the present ruling,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 11948: 11950: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Darr v. Burford339 U.S. 200 (1950)
  2. Wade v. Mayo334 U.S. 672 (1948)
  3. Gordon v. Scudder163 F.2d 518 (9th Cir. 1947)

Most recent

  1. Darr v. Burford339 U.S. 200 (1950)
  2. Wade v. Mayo334 U.S. 672 (1948)
  3. Gordon v. Scudder163 F.2d 518 (9th Cir. 1947)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114 (1944) 509
Dawsett v. Benson, 156 F.2d 669 (6th Cir. 1946) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list