TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Shiflett v. Welch

Shiflett v. Welch, 161 F.2d 933 (4th Cir. 1947)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 15, 1947
Docket
No. 5592
Citations
161 F.2d 9331947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted of manslaughter in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia and the conviction was affirmed on appeal. Shiflett v. United States, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 403 , 136 F.2d 765 . The point raised by the petition for habeas corpus is in effect the same as that raised on the appeal, viz., that after the jury had mistakenly announced a verdict of not guilty on the first count of a two count indictment, as to which a verdict of not guilty had been directed on the second count, but before the verdict had been accepted and the jury discharged, the court was without power to permit the jury to correct its mistake in open court, without retiring to the jury room, and return the verdict of not guilty on the second count with a verdict of guilty of manslaughter on the first count. The point is manifestly so entirely lacking in merit as not to warrant discussion; and nothing is added to it by the attempt to introduce an affidavit of an investigator to the effect that some jurors had said that they had not considered the first count of the indictment in the jury room. It is elementary that jurors will not be heard to impeach their verdict;- and, in addition to this, the record shows that the jurors were polled in open court and each of them announced that he found petitioner guilty of manslaughter on the first count of the indictment. The order dismissing the petition for the writ will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 11957: 11962: 21968: 21974: 11979: 11990: 119482026peak 1962 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Jon Darrell Stauffer922 F.2d 508 (9th Cir. 1990)
  2. United States v. James L. Love597 F.2d 81 (6th Cir. 1979)
  3. Leon Jackson v. United States313 F.2d 572 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  4. United States v. Daigle149 F. Supp. 409 (D.D.C. 1957)
  5. United States v. Mike Howard507 F.2d 559 (8th Cir. 1974)
  6. Richard Dudley Helms v. United States310 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1962)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Jon Darrell Stauffer922 F.2d 508 (9th Cir. 1990)
  2. United States v. James L. Love597 F.2d 81 (6th Cir. 1979)
  3. United States v. Mike Howard507 F.2d 559 (8th Cir. 1974)
  4. People v. Arroyo Ramírez96 P.R. 563 (1968)
  5. Pueblo v. Arroyo Ramírez96 P.R. Dec. 576 (1968)
  6. Leon Jackson v. United States313 F.2d 572 (D.C. Cir. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Shiflett v. United States, 136 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1943) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list