Hoffman v. Branch
HOFFMAN v. BRANCH, Auditor
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The only question presented in this case is the constitutionality of the act, (Laws, 1893, p. 171), to provide for an issue of bonds for the improvement of streets and the paving of the same in incorporated cities, and for the payfnent of costs thereof by installments. This case is within the principle announced by this court in the case of Warren v. Crosby, ante, p. 558 ( 34 Pac. Rep. 661 ), and the act in question is constitutional, and the judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as may be necessary and proper.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.