TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Carmody v. Schramm

Carmody v. Schramm, 38 P. 1092 (Or. 1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Oregon Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 26, 1894
Citations
38 P. 109225 Or. 5711894 Ore. LEXIS 58
Disposition
Affirmed.
Summary
Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. This is a suit by the appellant, Mary E. Carmody, to set aside four deeds executed by Lucinda Hawkins (now deceased), one deed to John Schramm, a second deed to Charles H. Schramm, a third deed dated July fifth, eighteen hundred and eighty-nine, to Samuel Hawkins, and a fourth deed dated July fifth, eighteen hundred and eighty-nine, to Henry H. Hawkins, each deed conveying about forty acres of agricultural land. The two Schramms are grandsons, and the two Hawkinses are sons of the said Lucinda Hawkins. The grounds alleged in the complaint are that Lucinda Hawkins was old, weak, and infirm in body, and feeble and unsound in mind, and was easily influenced and prejudiced against her best friends. And that the defendants, taking advantage of the weak and feeble condition of her mind and body, did unduly influence her to convey said property to them, and to disinherit her daughter, the plaintiff. At the trial before M. C. George, Esq., the complaint was dismissed as to the Hawkinses and the referee reported in favor of the other two defendants. This report having been confirmed by the court, plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The determination of the question involved in this case rests wholly upon matters of fact, an examination of which has satified us that the conclusions of the trial court are correct, and that the decree must be affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list