Sharpe v. Hartman
Sharpe v. Hartman, 40 P. 230 (Or. 1894)
Summary
Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge.
This was originally a suit by Penumbra Kelly and others to wind up the affairs of the Northwest Loan and Trust Company, an alleged banking concern in the City of Portland, manipulated by one George B. Markle. The defendant Hartman was appointed receiver in the summer of eighteen hundred and ninety-three, and afterward Kate H. Morgan Sharpe intervened claiming a preference for certain gold coin delivered to the trust company for the purpose of paying a mortgage, but which it had converted to its own use. The court below disallowed the preference, and the interventor appealed.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The facts in the case bring it within the ruling this day announced in Ferchen v. Arndt, 26 Or. 121 , and an order will be entered accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.