State ex rel. Sealy v. Stolz
State ex rel. Sealy v. Stolz, 44 P. 1090 (Or. 1895)
Summary
Appeal from Multnomah: Hartwell Hurley, Judge.
Quo warranto proceeding by Francis Sealy to ascertain by what right Gideon Stolz and others were exercising the functions of officers and directors of the Pacific Vinegar Company. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appealed.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
On motion of the attorney-general the appeal herein is hereby dismissed. Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.