TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cantwell v. United States

Cantwell v. United States, 163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 8, 1947
Docket
No. 5641
Citations
163 F.2d 7821947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 399 . The only question presented by the appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellants to withdraw their plea of guilty. No abuse of discretion is shown. On the contrary, the evidence before the court was clearly sufficient to establish guilt on the part of appellants and they offered no evidence to establish their innocence.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11993: 119582026peak 1958 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Marlin Dean Hoyt and Robert Frederick Mall v. United States252 F.2d 460 (10th Cir. 1958)
  2. United States v. Shahram Shirkhani989 F.2d 496 (4th Cir. 1993)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Shahram Shirkhani989 F.2d 496 (4th Cir. 1993)
  2. Marlin Dean Hoyt and Robert Frederick Mall v. United States252 F.2d 460 (10th Cir. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list