White v. Geinger
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Burnett
delivered the opinion of the court.
1. Section 175, L. O. L., says:
"A motion to set aside a judgment and for a new trial, with the affidavits, if any, in support thereof, shall be filed within one day after the entry of the judgment sought to be set aside, or such further time as the court may allow.”
In view of this statute, the Circuit Court could not properly entertain the motion filed more than one day after the trial, without extension of time having been granted: State v. McDaniel, 39 Or. 161 ( 65 Pac. 520 ).
2. Moreover, as held in Macartney v. Shipherd, 60 Or. 133 ( 117 Pac. 814 , Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1257), no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial. For these reasons, the defendant has no standing in this court by virtue of his appeal, and the judgment against him must be affirmed.
Affirmed: Rehearing Denied.
Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Eakin and Mr. Justice Bean concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.