TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mowrey v. Bouton

Mowrey v. Bouton, 154 P. 897 (Or. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Oregon Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 8, 1916
Judges
Benson
Citations
154 P. 89779 Or. 1821916 Ore. LEXIS 175
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Appeal and Error — Question Presented for Review not in Bill of Exceptions. 1. Where objection was made to a question on cross-examination and the bill of exceptions did not disclose whether such question was ever answered the appellate court will be unable to say whether or not plaintiff was injured by failure of the court to sustain the objection. Appeal and Error — Rulings of Court on Objections — Offers of Proof — ■ Exceptions. 2. Where the court sustains objections to questions asked by appellant and where there was a failure by counsel to inform the court as to what the answers were expected to disclose, it is the rule that in order to make the alleged errors subject to review, the bill of exceptions must disclose what it was expected to prove by the answers to such questions, and hence if any error was committed in the ease at bar it has not been made available on appeal — citing Kelly v. Highfield, 15 Or. 277 (14 Pac. 744).
Summary
From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge. Statement by Mr.' Justice Benson. This is an action by A. M. Mowrey against E. F. Bouton and L. J. Breslin, to recover damages for fraudulent representations, whereby it is alleged that plaintiff was induced to purchase shares of stock in a corporation which was insolvent, and whose stock was worthless. Upon a trial there was a verdict and judgment for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Benson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

The assignments of error, of which there are six, are not at all satisfactory, being vague and indefinite, but we have examined the bill of exceptions with great care, and shall consider them as fully as may be necessary to a determination of the question presented.

1. The second assignment complains of the action of the court in permitting the defendants to ask the following question of the plaintiff upon cross-examination :

“You were offered a chance, were you not, after they finally forced it into bankruptcy, to go in with the other members of the company and buy up the assets?”

If this question was ever answered, the bill of exceptions does not disclose the fact, so we are unable to say whether or not plaintiff was injured by the ruling of the court.

2. As to the other assignments, it is sufficient to say that they all attack the rulings of the court in sustaining objections to questions asked by plaintiff, and in every instance there was a failure upon the part of counsel to inform the court as to what the answer was expected to disclose, and the questions themselves do not indicate the reply to be anticipated. This court has held in a number of cases' beginning with Kelley v. Highfield, 15 Or. 277 ( 14 Pac. 744 ), that to make such exceptions available the bill of exceptions must show what it was expected to prove by the answer to the question.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 119182026peak 1918 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. Stillwell176 P. 123 (Or. 1918)

Most recent

  1. Johnson v. Stillwell176 P. 123 (Or. 1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Kelley v. Highfield, 14 P. 744 (Or. 1887) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list