Bandlow v. Rothman
William F. BANDLOW and Karl Sorenson v. Stuart ROTHMAN, individually and as General Counsel, Chairman and Members, respectively, of and constituting the National Labor Relations Board
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants asked the District Court to require the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint charging unfair labor practices. They also sought to compel the Board to set aside the General Counsel’s refusal. This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the District Court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The court was clearly right. It “has no power to order the General Counsel to issue a complaint and no power to require the Board to issue an order in a matter which is not before the Board.” Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 317, 201 F.2d 187, 188 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 930 , 73 S.Ct. 792 , 97 L.Ed. 1359 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Rockford Redi-Mix Co., Inc. v. Zipp
- Bandlow v. Rothman
- Retail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Rothman
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
- Southern California District Council of Laborers & Its Affiliated Local 1184 v. Ordman
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corporation, Roane Electric Furnace Division
Most recent
- Kolinske v. Lubbers
- Rockford Redi-Mix Co., Inc. v. Zipp
- Saez v. Goslee
- Southern California District Council of Laborers & Its Affiliated Local 1184 v. Ordman
- United Electrical Contractors Association v. Ordman
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corporation, Roane Electric Furnace Division
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.