Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,341 John Consorti & Frances Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Co. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Subsequent history: rev'd sub nom. Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415 (1996). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
64 F.3d 781w Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,341 John CONSORTI & Frances Consorti, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as Armstrong Cork Co.; Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al., Defendants, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 857, Docket 94-7501.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 14, 1994. Decided Aug. 28, 1995.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“One of the most persistent and troublesome problems in the administration of justice in our civil jury system is the unpredictable relationship between different juries’ awards, particularly for intangibles such as pain and suffering.”)
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- Federal District Courts3
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.