TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McHenry v. Florida Bar

G. Stewart McHENRY, Went for It, Inc., a Florida Corporation, John T. Blakely, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, Susan v. Bloemendaal, Defendants-Appellants

McHenry v. Fla. Bar, 66 F.3d 270 (11th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 22, 1995
Docket
No. 93-2069
Judges
Black, Dyer, Alaimo
Citations
66 F.3d 2701995 WL 5611391995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27178

Opinion — Per Curiam

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before BLACK, Circuit Judge, DYER, Senior Circuit Judge, and ALAIMO * , Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On June 21, 1995, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in McHenry v. Florida Bar, 21 F.3d 1038 (11th Cir.1994).

See Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc., — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2371 , 132 L.Ed.2d 541 . (1995). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff, McHenry v. Florida Bar, 808 F.Supp. 1543 (M.D.Fla.1992), and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fla. Bar v. Went for It, Inc., 515 U.S. 618 (1995) 433
G. Stewart McHenry Went for It, Inc., a Fla. Corp., John T. Blakely v. The Fla. Bar, Susan v. Bloemendaal, 21 F.3d 1038 (11th Cir. 1994) 27
McHenry v. the Fla. Bar, 808 F. Supp. 1543 (M.D. Fla. 1992) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list