TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ditch v. Edwards

David Ditch, in error v. Elvira L. Edwards, of Ninian Edwards, in error

Ditch v. Edwards, 2 Ill. 127 (1834)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 15, 1834
Judges
Lockwood
Citations
2 Ill. 127
Headnotes
Error to Monroe. A return to a summons signed by a person as “ deputy sheriff,” without using the name of the sheriff, is erroneous and void. If judgment be rendered by default, against a defendant who has not been served with process, the proceedings are coram nonjudice. But the reversal of such a judgment does not affect the rights of the plaintiff below. A cause will not be remanded, where the proceedings in the Court below are coram nonjudice.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lockwood

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Lockwood, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is a writ of error to the Monroe Circuit Court. The error relied on, is that the summons is returned by a person who signs his name as deputy sheriff, without using the name of the sheriff. At the return term, a judgment was rendered by default. This was clearly erroneous according to the decision in the case of Ryan v. Eads. (1) The defendant’s counsel, on the argument, conceded that the judgment must be reversed, but requested that the cause might be remanded to'the Circuit Court for further proceedings. This Court has power to remand causes for further proceedings, where there remains anything in the Court below that is legal. In this case, so far as the defendant below is concerned, (he not having appeared, and there being no service by the sheriff,) the cause must be considered as coram nonjudice, and consequently there can be nothing to remand. The reversal of the judgment below, however, cannot impair the rights of the plaintiff below; if she has a cause of action, it still exists, and is in no wise impaired by the judgment below, and its reversal in this Court. The judgment is reversed with costs.

Judgment reversed.

Breese 168.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1908: 11912: 11924: 11948: 119082026peak 1908 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Summerville v. Sorrenson136 N.W. 938 (N.D. 1912)
  2. Thompson Bros. v. Phillips198 Iowa 1064 (1924)
  3. People v. Myers3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 477 (1908)
  4. City of Chicago v. County of Cook79 N.E.2d 749 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Most recent

  1. City of Chicago v. County of Cook79 N.E.2d 749 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
  2. Thompson Bros. v. Phillips198 Iowa 1064 (1924)
  3. Summerville v. Sorrenson136 N.W. 938 (N.D. 1912)
  4. People v. Myers3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 477 (1908)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list