TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Haynes v. Huffman

Ricky D. Haynes v. Larry Huffman, Regional Administrator James B. Taylor, Warden Lieutenant Cottrell, Investigator J. Woodson, Captain A. Giles, Corrections Officer R.K. White, Hearings Officer C.A. Foster, Corrections Officer D. Lovejoy, Inmate S. Jones, Major

Haynes v. Huffman, 66 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 14, 1995
Docket
No. 95-6703
Citations
66 F.3d 3161995 WL 5434701995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33601
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

66 F.3d 316

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ricky D. HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry HUFFMAN, Regional Administrator; James B. Taylor, Warden; Lieutenant Cottrell, Investigator; J. Woodson, Captain; A. Giles, Corrections Officer; R.K. White, Hearings Officer; C.A. Foster, Corrections Officer; D. Lovejoy, Inmate; S. Jones, Major, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6703.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1995.

Ricky D. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint upon recommendation of the magistrate judge. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981) 454

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list