Hitchcock v. Haight
Chester Hitchcock, in error v. Daniel S. Haight, in error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The Opinion of the Court was delivered by Treat, J. The plaintiffs in error ask for a rule on the defendant to join in error. The scire facias was served on the defendant two days after the return day. The service amounts to nothing. The writ had lost its vitality. Its.force was spent. The defendant is not before us.
The motion is denied.
Motion denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.