Moser v. Matt
Philip Moser, in Error v. Jacob Matt, in Error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Breese, J. We see nothing in this case to take it out of the cases heretofore decided by this court. It is essential, a definite time shall be alleged for the completion of the work. We cannot imply a time. We adhere to the opinions and rulings in Cook v. Heald, 21 Ill. R. 425; Same v. Vreeland, ib. 431; Cook v. Rofinot, ib. 437; Senior v. Brebnor, 22 Ill. R. 252; McClurken et al. v. Logan et al., 23 ib. 79. We can see no difference in principle between the cases, and deem it useless to go again into the argument.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.