TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ryan v. Anderson

Martin Ryan v. James L. Anderson

Ryan v. Anderson, 24 Ill. 652 (1861)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1861
Citations
24 Ill. 652
Headnotes
Where parties by agreement consent to an appeal, it will be sustained, although error was the appropriate 'remedy.
Summary
This was a motion to dismiss an appeal, because the judgment below was for costs only, and the action did not relate to a franchise or freehold; and because the judgment was in favor of the parties appealing; and they did not sign the appeal bond. The record shows the following agreement: “It is agreed that this case may be appealed to the Supreme Oourt upon the bond of William McMurphy, R. M. Worthington, and George Metz, directors of said township, without further security.” The action was commenced by certain parties, as collector, treasurer and school trustees of township two, etc., in Schuyler county.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam. The court having jurisdiction of the subject matter, consent will give jurisdiction over the person; by agreement, these parties are properly in court. Although error was the appropriate mode of procedure to bring the parties before the court, yet the remedy does not depend upon the process, and the agreement precludes the parties from taking advantage of the means adopted to bring them before this tribunal.

Motion denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11925: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diamond v. Piggly Wiggly Stores, Inc.236 Ill. App. 68 (1925)
  2. Mason v. Browner135 N.E. 735 (Ill. 1922)

Most recent

  1. Diamond v. Piggly Wiggly Stores, Inc.236 Ill. App. 68 (1925)
  2. Mason v. Browner135 N.E. 735 (Ill. 1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list