Comstock v. Hitt
Comstock v. Hitt, 40 Ill. 121 (1865)
Headnotes
Oral argument will not be allowed by one party on the first call of the docket, and by the other on the second call.
Summary
Counsel inquired whether one party would be allowed to argue the cause orally upon the first call of the docket, and the other party have the same right upon the second call.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam: We cannot allow that to be done, even by consent of parties. If the case is argued orally on the first call of the docket by one party and not by the other, we will then take it for consideration, and no subsequent oral argument will be heard.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.