Campbell v. State
Alexander Campbell v. The State of Illinois
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Lawrence delivered the opinion of the Court:
This was an application for judgment against certain lands for non-payment of school taxes. It was resisted by the appellants, and judgment having been rendered for the sale of the lands, the record has been brought to this court.
It appears that the township was divided into two school-districts, by a line running north and south through the center, and there are three school-houses in the district where the lands in question are situated. The lands are more than three miles from one of the houses. The taxes were levied for the support of the three schools.
This is a plain violation of the act of February 22, 1861, entitled an act to amend the school laws, page 181, of the session acts of that year. The sole object of that law seems to have been to prevent the imposition of such taxes as were levied in the present case. It directs expressly that no tax shall be levied, either for the erecting or repair of school-houses, or for the support of schools, on lands distant more than three miles from the location of the house or school. These lands are not liable for all the taxes levied upon them.
The judgment must be reversed, and unless the taxes are so levied as to show to what portion these lands are legally liable, the application for judgment must be refused. A judgment cannot he rendered for taxes, a part of which are shown by the record to be illegal. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.