Gage v. Rumsey
Asahel Gage v. Israel P. Rumsey
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Breese delivered the opinion of the Court:
The land in question had not been divided into lots by the oivners, and was therefore improperly assessed as lots. The demurrer admits the facts which are properly pleaded in the bill, and they show a case where a party, having no right whatever to the land, sub-divided it, and ‘this without the knowledge or consent of the real owners. As such, it was assessed for taxes. The sub-division being without warrant, and void, the assessment was also void, as well as all subsequent proceedings thereunder. Sanderson v. City of LaSalle, 57 Ill. 445 .
The bill has equity, and the demurrer was properly overruled. The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Deeree affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.