TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Funk v. Ironmonger

Henry B. Funk v. Joseph J. Ironmonger

Funk v. Ironmonger, 76 Ill. 506 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1875
Citations
76 Ill. 506
Syllabus
1. Abatement—defendant sued out of Ms county. Under the statute in force in April, 1873, a plea in abatement to a suit brought in Morgan county, where the defendant was served in Macon county, which contains no averment that he was not a resident of Morgan county, or that the contract was not made therein, is bad on demurrer. 3. Summons to bobeign county—what lorn governs. Where a suit was brought before the Practice act of 1872 took effect, the law in force at the time the suit was brought was held to govern as to the right to send summons to another county for service.
Summary
Writ op,Error to the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Epi.ee, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, by Joseph J. Ironmonger, against Henry B. Funk. The suit ivas commenced April 3, 1872, and summons issued to the sheriff of Morgan county, which was returned not found. An alias summons issued August 31, 1872, to Morgan county, which was returned not served. At the December term, 1872, on motion, it was ordered that the cause be continued with alias summons to Macon county, which was served in that county April 30, 1873. The defendant, at the next term, pleaded in abatement, to which plea the court sustained a demurrer.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam: This suit was commenced April 3,1872, by the issuing of summons out of the circuit court of Morgan county, and is to be governed by the statute in force at that time. The plea in abatement contains no averment that the plaintiff was not a resident of that county, or that the contract was not made therein. It was, for that reason, bad, and the demurrer to it was properly sustained. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Elzy ex rel. Farmers' Bank of Gays v. Morrison180 Ill. App. 711 (1913)

Most recent

  1. Elzy ex rel. Farmers' Bank of Gays v. Morrison180 Ill. App. 711 (1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list